Sunday delivery via Wal-Mart.com and FedEx here. Clean bill of health... Cartoons all look and sound fine for the most part, and all are indeed uncensored. Wags to Riches has a slightly distorted track, too, though (but nowhere near as obvious as Daredevil Droopy).

So that you tube clip is an accurate sound representation on D.D.? And do you recommend fans to buy this? My copy should arrive by Wed.

Glad to hear that report.

The non-chronological approach will be worth it if it means that none of the cartoons will end up like the worst-looking cartoons on the Tom and Jerry Golden Collection.

Glad to hear that report.

The non-chronological approach will be worth it if it means that none of the cartoons will end up like the worst-looking cartoons on the Tom and Jerry Golden Collection.

Amen to that. I just watched "The Zoot Cat" from both the Golden Collection Blu-ray and the old Turner TV print on the Spotlight Collection... and the difference is insane. The colors are destroyed in the print Warner used for their HD restoration. This is one of my all-time favorite T&Js, so if Warner is really re-scanning everything in their library in 4K, I hope it (and the other inferior-looking entries) can get a new and properly done restoration one day.

I mean...

That was one of my childhood favorites...seeing that print makes me sick...
Honestly, there were only 2 Metrocolor prints they used in that set that looked somewhat decent. Those being "Puss Gets the Boot" and "The Lonesome Mouse". Everything else looks horrid.

The Porky set was so shitty that people are still approaching the Warner Archive releases with trepidation 2+ years later, even when they really shouldn't. I think at this point, though, with a score of 6:1 (I'm counting the H-B sets here), people can rest easy...

The Porky set was so shitty that people are still approaching the Warner Archive releases with trepidation 2+ years later, even when they really shouldn't. I think at this point, though, with a score of 6:1 (I'm counting the H-B sets here), people can rest easy...

Look, for the record, I stand by Jerry, not Warners.

The Porky set was so shitty that people are still approaching the Warner Archive releases with trepidation 2+ years later, even when they really shouldn't. I think at this point, though, with a score of 6:1 (I'm counting the H-B sets here), people can rest easy...

Look, for the record, I stand by Jerry, not Warners.

What has that got to do with anything?

The Porky set was so shitty that people are still approaching the Warner Archive releases with trepidation 2+ years later, even when they really shouldn't. I think at this point, though, with a score of 6:1 (I'm counting the H-B sets here), people can rest easy...

Look, for the record, I stand by Jerry, not Warners.

What has that got to do with anything?

Jerry was involved with the set.

The Porky set was so shitty that people are still approaching the Warner Archive releases with trepidation 2+ years later, even when they really shouldn't. I think at this point, though, with a score of 6:1 (I'm counting the H-B sets here), people can rest easy...

Look, for the record, I stand by Jerry, not Warners.

What has that got to do with anything?

Jerry was involved with the set.

And that means no one should be allowed to criticize the set?

'Cause it sure as hell sounds like that's what you're saying.

I was slightly deafened the set from some people that went too far bashing it. Can we please move on?

Glad the set is fine.

However, I could go without that brash (hidden number)obscene name calling on "Porky". We all get your understandable disappointment. You don't have deeply rub it in to our web browser.